Esker Forge
$ CAD 0.00 0

Cart

No products in the cart.

Observing Safety and Handling Incidents Together

Last updated November 28, 2025

Table Of Contents

Introduction

This document is intended to serve as a resource for HEMA trainers, club leaders, and practitioners who want to build a culture of safety through awareness, preparation, and communication. It outlines common injury types, protective gear considerations, risk mitigation strategies, and clear protocols for handling incidents.
This is not just a reference document. It also contains important messages for you and those in your community. These are roughly:
  • By practicing HEMA, you run a very significant and real risk of getting injured.
  • The gear we have available to us is not sufficient to mitigate this risk.
  • You should make an informed decision on the risk you take.
  • It is important to follow up on and learn from safety incidents when they take place.
Legal liability and related topics are not in the scope of this document. We are not lawyers and nothing in this document is legal advice.

We are also not medical professionals. While we discuss medical topics, these are provided without warranty of completeness or accuracy. We strongly encourage you to consult with a medical professional such as your family doctor or physiotherapist before engaging in HEMA, especially if you are seeking advice related to pre-existing conditions.

Ultimately, each of us is responsible for our own safety when practicing HEMA. This document is provided for general information only and should not be relied on as a guarantee of safety. The authors and publishers make no representations or warranties, express or implied, about the completeness or accuracy of this guide. Use of the information is entirely at your own risk, and the authors and publishers are not liable for any injury, loss, or damage arising from its use.

Acknowledging Risk: Overcoming Optimistic Bias

One of the first challenges in fostering a safety culture is overcoming optimistic bias. This is a cognitive bias that leads people to incorrectly believe they are less likely than others to experience negative events (like injuries). For example, HEMA fencers may subconsciously assume “accidents happen to other people, not me.” You cannot practice HEMA "safely" any more than you can play football or skydive "safely" - there is always some level of risk you are taking on, and it is important to be well-informed about those risks. More on that in the section on informed consent.

Optimistic bias can cause underestimation of injury risk and inadequate precautions. To train safely, we must consciously adopt a mindset that acknowledges the real risks and our own vulnerability. No one is invincible and anyone can get injured. Embracing this reality helps ensure we stay prepared and proactive about safety measures (proper gear, controlled technique, first aid readiness, etc.) rather than becoming complacent. By recognizing the possibility of injury or disability, we are more likely to take precautions and be mentally prepared to respond if an incident occurs.

Common Injuries in Historical Fencing

Historical fencing is a contact activity, and injuries will happen despite our best efforts. Some typical injuries that HEMA practitioners are exposed to and should be aware of include:

Impact from blades or contact can rupture small blood vessels under the skin, causing tender, discolored patches. Bruises are very common and usually minor, resulting from the frequent knocks in drilling or sparring. They indicate that energy was absorbed by tissue but generally heal on their own with little more than soreness.

A strain is a tear or stretch in muscle fibers or tendons, while a sprain is a stretch or tear of ligaments. These occur often from overexertion or improper technique. For example: a lunge with poor form might strain a groin or calf muscle, and a hard cut might sprain a wrist. Shoulders, wrists, and knees are particularly at risk during certain fencing movements that push these joints to their limits. Expect pain, swelling, and reduced function until healed. Mitigations include proper stretching before engaging in physical activity and strengthening specific muscle groups to support proper form.

Sudden twists, impacts, or falls can injure joints. For instance, a throw might dislocate a shoulder or jam an elbow, and an awkward step can sprain an ankle. Fencing involves rapid changes of direction and explosive movements, so joints can be put under stress. Knees are vulnerable to hyperextension if footwork is off or if you stumble, and shoulders/elbows can be easily injured by grappling or landing wrong. Proper falling technique and controlled movements help reduce these risks.

Repetitive training can lead to conditions like tendonitis (tendon inflammation) or bursitis (inflammation of the cushioning bursae sacs). Practicing the same cut or guard transition hundreds of times can strain the tendons in your wrists or elbows. Shoulder tendonitis is also common from frequent sword swings. Overuse injuries develop over days or weeks of training and manifest as persistent pain or stiffness. They signal the need for rest and possibly technique adjustment or conditioning to strengthen the affected area.

Footwork is fundamental to fencing, and the quick, lateral movements can be hard on the feet. An ankle sprain can happen if you land on an edge of the foot or trip over an obstacle on the floor. Poor traction or uneven surfaces increase the risk. Less commonly, one might even suffer a fractured toe or metatarsal if the foot is struck or pinned. Good shoes (discussed later) and mindful stepping are key prevention measures.

Although we use blunt training swords, accidents can still cause cuts. A broken blade with a sharp shard, an untipped rapier point, or even the edge of a badly burred blunt can puncture skin. Such injuries are rare but possible, especially in areas not covered by sturdy protection. Always inspect weapons for sharp burrs or cracks, and maintain your gear. (Notably, historical fencing masks and jackets are rated to resist puncture – e.g. 350N or 1600N – to help prevent these incidents.)

Direct strikes to the face are extraordinarily rare when proper masks are worn, but they can happen if a mask fails or if someone fences without one. A lapse in using a mask, or a freak equipment failure, could lead to a broken nose, facial cuts, or even eye injury. Severe head trauma or skull fracture is possible in a worst-case scenario (such as a sharp broken blade entering a mask), emphasizing why a well-made mask and backup throat protection are absolutely required.

The hands are one of the most exposed body parts in fencing. Even with gloves, a direct hit to the fingers can be extremely painful or cause fractures. Broken fingers are among the most common serious injuries in HEMA, often occurring when a thinly padded glove is struck by a fast-moving blade. Fingers and thumbs have many small bones (phalanges), which can easily break if not adequately protected. “Black thumb”, or subungual hematoma (bleeding under the fingernail), is so common that one survey found ~40% of participants reported they had experienced it. Proper fencing gloves (discussed below) and drilling covered strikes and good edge alignment (so your forte, not your fingers, receive incoming blows) are crucial to hand safety.

Whiplash is a neck injury caused by a forceful, rapid back-and-forth jarring of the head (similar to the crack of a whip). In fencing, a strong strike to the mask or an abrupt push/pull in grappling could whip the head suddenly. Whiplash often isn’t immediately obvious – symptoms like neck pain, stiffness, headaches, dizziness, fatigue, blurred vision, or tingling in the arms might only appear hours or even days later. Fortunately, most whiplash cases resolve in a few weeks with rest and exercise, but some can cause longer-lasting pain. If you experience a neck “tweak” or hard jolt during sparring, monitor for symptoms and seek medical evaluation if they appear.

A concussion is a traumatic brain injury caused by the brain suddenly colliding with the inside of the skull due to an impact or rapid acceleration-deceleration force. Even with a fencing mask on, a sufficiently heavy blow or high-speed thrust can rattle the brain. Think of your brain like an egg yolk floating in fluid: a hard shake can make it hit the shell. Concussions can result from direct hits to the head (e.g. a powerful blow in a longsword bout) even when gear is worn, especially with synthetic trainers or boffers which may lend a false sense of safety. Symptoms may include headache, confusion, dizziness, nausea, or brief loss of consciousness. It’s critical to note that no mask or helmet can fully prevent concussions – they mainly stop cuts or skull fractures, but the brain can still slosh inside the skull. Any time someone sustains a significant head hit and shows possible concussion symptoms, stop activity immediately and seek medical assessment. Return to training only after full recovery, because a second concussion before the first heals can be much more dangerous. Early detection is crucial. Ensure that those providing first aid have a copy of the Concussion Recognition Tool 5 (CRT5) handout, it’s very easy to follow and could save someone’s life. Prevention is difficult as no available gear provides sufficient protection. The most effective way to mitigate concussion is to avoid forceful strikes to the head, whether by reducing force, using lighter weapons, or avoiding strikes to the head altogether.

CTE is a long-term degenerative brain condition linked to repeated head impacts over time. It’s the condition famously found in some ex-boxers and NFL players (once termed “punch-drunk syndrome”). CTE is characterized by an abnormal buildup of tau protein in the brain and typically manifests years later with symptoms like memory loss, confusion, mood swings, aggression, and dementia-like mental decline. Importantly, CTE can develop not only from diagnosed concussions but also from many sub-concussive blows – smaller hits that don’t cause obvious symptoms can still cumulatively damage the brain. HEMA has nowhere near the head-impact frequency of sports like boxing or American football, but it does involve occasional head strikes. This is why minimizing unnecessary head trauma is vital. Using proper control, limiting excessive force to the head, and avoiding “ego-driven” hard hits in sparring are all ways to help protect your brain for the long term. Remember, wearing thicker padding or a harder helmet is not a license to absorb headshots – prevention and control are better than gear.

The Risk Compensation Effect

Protective gear absolutely does prevent or lessen many injuries. However, there is a psychological phenomenon known as risk compensation: when people feel more protected, they may subconsciously behave more recklessly, offsetting the safety benefits of the gear. In other words, if you don a bunch of heavy gear, you might take risks (attacking uncovered, or not parrying as diligently) that you wouldn’t take without it, because you feel safe. Studies in sports have documented this effect – for example, bicyclists tend to ride faster and feel less threatened when wearing helmets, and children running an obstacle course with padding crash into more objects than when without. Overconfidence from gear can thus increase the likelihood of injury – to you or your training partners.

This does not mean that you should avoid protective gear. This is not permission to engage in full-contact low or no-gear sparring.

So how do we counteract risk compensation? The key is mindfulness and discipline. No matter how much gear you wear, always treat an opponent’s blade as a serious threat and maintain respect for each other's safety. Coaches and clubs should emphasize that gear is a last resort defense, not an excuse for undisciplined fencing and excessive force. Ultimately, protective gear works best in tandem with good technique – not as a replacement for it. With that philosophy in mind, let’s examine the common protective equipment in HEMA, their benefits, and their limitations.

Protective Gear

Keeping in mind that protective gear works best when combined with good technqiue, let’s examine the common protective equipment in HEMA, their benefits, and their limitations.

Head and Neck Protection

The fencing mask is the single most important piece of HEMA safety gear – it shields your face, head, and part of the neck. However, it’s widely acknowledged that standard sport fencing masks were designed for Olympic fencing, and not the heavier weapons used in HEMA.

Masks are rated by European standards: a “350N” mask (CEN Level 1) has a bib tested to resist at least 350 Newtons of puncture force (and typically a carbon-steel mesh around 600N), whereas a “1600N” mask (CEN Level 2, often called FIE mask) has a bib resisting 1600N and a stronger stainless-steel mesh around 1000N. In practice, a Level 2 (1600N) mask offers significantly more resistance to penetration than a 350N mask – an important factor if a blade thrusts at your throat or a broken blade’s tip hits the mesh. Thus, you should highly consider investing in a 1600N/FIE mask (many competitions now require them for participation.)

Regardless of rated strength, fit is critical: a mask should fit snugly so it doesn’t shift on impact. A poorly fitting mask that rocks back and forth can impair vision and even contribute to whiplash when struck. Always adjust the strap and, if needed, add extra padding (or use a scrum cap underneath) to achieve a secure fit.

That said, no fencing mask can guarantee prevention of concussions or brain injury. Even the best masks primarily stop penetration and skull fracture, not the inertial force of your brain moving. A high-quality mask will have features that help reduce impact energy reaching your head: robust stainless steel mesh that can deform slightly to absorb force, heavier weight (paradoxically, a heavier mask can be safer because it requires more force to accelerate your skull), and thick padding inside to cushion blows.

Regularly inspect your mask – if the mesh of your 1600N/FIE mask is dented, you can gently push it back out (manufacturers often advise using a wrench or hammer to push dents out). Dents in these masks are normal; they’re evidence that the mask did its job by deforming to absorb energy from a blow. Pushing a dent out of any mask with a mesh made out of carbon steel wire is not advisable, this material is prone to brittleness that can result in catastrophic failure. Remember that masks are consumable, over time the metal fatigues and padding wears down. Replace masks once they become too compromised or loose.

In recent years, some suppliers have introduced helmet-style head protection (often with hard plastic or composite shells covering most of the mask). The idea is to improve coverage (especially the back/top of the head) and possibly add more impact dispersion. Intuitively, one might think a harder shell = safer head. However, recall the egg analogy: making the shell harder can still scramble the yolk. A rigid helmet might cause certain blows to glance off, which is good for deflecting cuts, but it can also mean that instead of the side mesh denting or overlay deforming, more force is transmitted into your head before the sword bounces off.

Until more data or testing is available, treat rigid helmets as a trade-off: great for added coverage, possibly better against cuts, but they do not reduce concussion risk and may even make it worse.

A popular way to improve mask fit and add a bit of cushion is wearing a padded cap underneath. Options include foam or gel skull caps sold for HEMA or rugby scrum caps. Their primary benefit is that they fill any extra space, making a loose mask fit more snugly so it’s less likely to rotate or get dislodged on impact. This snugness alone improves safety—a mask that stays put protects better.

Additionally, padding adds a small additional buffer; a gel liner can reportedly reduce impact forces by up to ~25% according to some product tests. The benefit of gel caps over simple foam is that they maintain their cushioning longer and they mold to your head’s shape better, giving consistent contact.

However, we should not overestimate these caps—they are relatively thin and soft, so while they might take the edge off a blow, they do not dramatically lower concussion risk (some studies in rugby found no significant difference in concussion rates with scrum caps).

In short: use them if they help your mask fit or give you peace of mind, but don’t expect a night-and-day difference in protection. And if your mask is too tight, adding a cap can make it uncomfortably tight – find a balance or get a properly sized mask rather than over-stuffing a badly fitting one.

Back of head protection is essential in HEMA, as standard fencing masks leave this area exposed. A strike to the back of the head, though not a valid target, can still happen and cause serious injury. Most practitioners use either a full mask overlay with built-in protection or a separate occipital guard that straps onto the mask.

The best options use foam and rigid plastic to absorb and disperse impact. Some are integrated into padded overlays, while others are standalone cups or plates. Either setup is valid, but coverage should be secure, stable, and not shift during movement. Coach-style mask covers from sport fencing lack the rigid protection needed and aren’t suitable on their own.

Back-of-head protection may slightly reduce ventilation or hearing, but it shouldn’t affect visibility. Check regularly for cracks, loose straps, or worn padding, and replace if damaged. For any full-speed sparring, especially with steel weapons, proper back-of-head coverage isn’t optional, it’s a basic safety requirement.

The gorget is a collar that guards your throat and upper spine. In historical fencing, a blade under the mask’s bib is a nightmare scenario; even a blunt thrust to the throat can crush the airway. There have been frightening cases where a powerful thrust caused serious breathing trauma even through a mask bib and jacket collar – people have ended up in the ER from throat hits. A gorget provides a hard or padded shell over the delicate larynx and carotid artery area. Even though a fencing mask has a bib, and a good jacket has a high collar, that’s often not enough against a misplaced thrust.

Some modern gorgets are designed with a flared plate (or “blade catcher”) that sits just under the mask bib, aiming to trap any blade that slides up the chest toward the neck. This feature, if your gorget has it, should protrude slightly above your jacket collar.

Always wear a gorget during free sparring and competitions. Yes, gorgets can be a bit uncomfortable or hot, but as someone once quipped, “If you think a gorget is uncomfortable, try a tracheotomy.”

Hand Protection (Gloves)

Investing in good gloves is just as crucial as having a good mask – maybe even more so, since hand injuries are far more common. The fingers and knuckles often lead exchanges (think about how often your hands get hit when you mis-time a parry), and they have only thin bones and tendons that can be easily damaged. A broken finger can take you out of training for weeks and affect your daily life (even costing you work). Thus, gloves designed for HEMA have become a mini-industry of their own. There are two main styles of gloves used in HEMA: “lobster” gloves and finger gloves.

These are mitten-like designs (often with a clamshell or segmented plates) that cover multiple fingers together, resembling a lobster’s claw. Examples include SPES Heavies, SG Sparring Mittens, CHFG Michael/Raphael, HF Black Knight, Kvetun Xiphosura, etc. They typically sacrifice some dexterity in favor of maximizing protection. Because the fingers are not separated, it’s impossible for a blade to hit one finger directly. Hard plastic or composite plates shield the back of the hand and fingers, and high-density foam or rubber absorbs impact. Lobster gloves, in general, offer superior protection against both cuts and thrusts to the hands – many can even prevent most finger breaks from the hardest longsword blows. The trade-off is bulk: fine finger articulation (for complex hilt maneuvers or grappling) is reduced, and some designs make it tricky to feel the sword grip.

These look more like medieval gauntlets, with each finger articulated. Examples include CHFG Gabriel, HF Black Prince, Pro Gauntlet, etc. Ultimately each finger is somewhat exposed compared to a lobster mitt. The advantage is increased dexterity – you can perform some complex actions more confidently. For weapons that require finger dexterity (rapier, sabre, sword & buckler) many fencers prefer these gloves. The downside, of course, is that a direct hit on a single finger can more easily break it, as the force isn’t distributed across a whole mitten. Even the best five-finger gloves (with plastic and padding reinforced fingers) may not stop a hit from causing a subungual hematoma (bleeding under the fingernail). It’s a calculated risk for the sake of slightly better handling.


Both types of gloves unfortunately share a major weak spot: the palms. Fencing gloves, for mobility, do not have hard protection on the inside of the hand. This means a thrust that slides down your blade and onto your glove’s palm (or a mis-placed parry where you basically grab the opponent’s point) can poke a very sensitive area. Such hits can be excruciating and cause deep bruising, even if they don’t cut the skin. Be aware of this in sparring – avoid exposing your palms upward.
Beginners should strongly consider starting with high-protection (lobster) gloves, especially for longsword or other two-handed weapons. The slight loss in finesse is worth it while you’re learning, to avoid serious hand injury. As you gain control or if your interests shift to lighter one-handed weapons, you might explore more flexible gloves. Always inspect gloves for wear – if the padding has compressed or plates cracked, their protection will be compromised. Most importantly, encourage your club to cultivate a culture of control when targeting the hands. Good gloves can only do so much to prevent injury.

Foot Protection (Shoes)

Footwork is literally the foundation of fencing. While we often focus on swords and upper body gear, having proper footwear can significantly reduce injury risk. HEMA involves lots of linear lunges, quick lateral movements, and sudden stops – movements that can punish your feet, ankles, and knees if unsupported. Court or fencing shoes, with their lateral support, reduce the risk of ankle sprains and provide cushioning that helps protect knee cartilage, which, once worn, doesn't regenerate. Be aware that court shoes will last longer on smooth flat surfaces. When used on concrete and asphalt they’ll need to be replaced more often.

Wearing running shoes or other highly cushioned trainers is not advised for fencing footwork; those are made for forward motion (running) and can increase the chance of rolling an ankle during a lunge or traverse. Likewise, very thin minimalist shoes may provide insufficient cushioning – repeated lunges can lead to plantar fasciitis or stress injuries in the feet without some shock absorption. Court shoes strike a good balance. They help protect your ankles (reducing sprain risk) and knees by cushioning the impact when you explosively step or lunge, which in turn protects your knee cartilage from wear (once cartilage is gone, it’s gone for good).

Torso Protection (Jackets and Overlap)

A good HEMA jacket (often called a gambeson) is your next line of defense after a mask and gloves. These long sleeve jackets are typically made with puncture-resistant fabrics and some level of padding. They serve two main purposes: impact reduction and penetration resistance. During sparring, a jacket’s padding will soften the blow of hits to your torso and arms, meaning fewer bruises. Many modern HEMA jackets use foam or quilted padding arrangements equivalent to a couple millimeters of foam – enough to take some of the sting out of most cuts. Some lighter jackets, however, are almost just a thick fabric shell with minimal padding; these rely on you to wear additional hard plates or simply tolerate more bruises.

The second protection aspect is puncture resistance, rated in Newtons similar to masks. Common jacket ratings are 350N and 800N, indicating the material’s resistance to a puncture force. Why does this matter? Because blades can break. If a sharp shard of steel or the jagged end of a broken feder drives into your torso, a puncture resistant jacket can mean the difference between a scratch and a life-threatening wound. In fact, sport fencing mandates 800N gear at higher levels for this reason – historically there have been fatalities in sport fencing from broken blades penetrating uniforms. HEMA has (knock on wood) avoided such tragedies in recent years, partly thanks to widespread use of high-Newton clothing in the community. So, if you can afford it, get an 800N (or 350N at minimum) rated jacket/pants set. They are a bit heavier, but they significantly lower the risk of a catastrophic puncture injury.

While Newton‑based ratings offer useful guidance, it’s important to understand that most HEMA gambesons and pants aren’t fully lab‑tested to the CE standards required in Olympic fencing. The 350N and 800N labels typically refer only to the fabric used—not the construction of the final garment. These fabrics may have been lab-tested and shown to meet CE-standard puncture resistance, but the completed jacket itself usually hasn’t been evaluated by a third party to confirm it performs to that level when worn. At best, some manufacturers—like SPES—use certified fabrics and have built strong reputations for real-world durability, but this is not the same as a fully tested or certified garment.

For those seeking HEMA jackets actually tested by a CE lab to 800N standards, the options are limited: InMotu St. George Jacket 800N (CE certified) and PBT HEMA 800N Evolution Full and Light Protective Jackets (CE tested). Note: CE certification requires specific design elements—such as a crotch strap—that two of these garments do not include.

One safety feature to look for in jackets is a built-in blade catcher at the collar. This is a stiff flap that sticks out at the neckline, intended to stop an upward-gliding blade (like a thrust sliding up your chest) from going under your mask bib. It works in conjunction with your mask’s bib and your gorget. Not all jackets have this, but it’s a great feature for peace of mind.

Finally, consider the overlap between your jacket and your pants. In sport fencing, rules require the jacket to overlap the pants by at least 10 cm all around, to ensure no gap where a blade could sneak in. In HEMA, we don’t have such explicit rules everywhere, but the principle is important. If you wear short jackets or a jacket that rides up, and low-cut pants, you might expose a strip of lower abdomen or flank when you lift your arms. A thrust could conceivably strike that gap of unprotected skin.

Elbows, Knees, and Groin

Certain body parts need extra protection beyond what the jacket or pants provide. Chief among these are the elbows, knees, and (for many) the groin.

Even with a sturdy jacket, elbows are bony and often catch pointy strikes from awkward angles. A simple hard-shell elbow cup worn over or under the sleeves can disperse the force of a direct hit. Many HEMA jackets have integrated pockets for elbow pads or come with matching hard elbow protectors. Use them! A hit to an unprotected funny bone is not funny – it can cause deep bruising or chipped bone. One thing to watch out for: if an elbow guard is loose or the strap slips, a thrust could potentially get underneath it. There’s not much you can do there except ensure your guards are snug and cover as much area as possible. It’s a rare occurrence, but be aware of the fit. Tighten the straps or even tape the guard in place if it tends to rotate.

Fencing can put knees in harm’s way. We often lunge low or step in close, and a stray swing might whack the side of your knee. A basic skateboarding or volleyball knee pad (hard shell or thick foam) worn under your pants can save you from nasty contusions. Like elbows, some fencing pants include pockets or attachment points for knee pads. At a minimum, wear something if you plan on any sparring or fast drills – knees are too important to your mobility to take chances. Also, if grappling or takedowns are allowed, knee pads help when you inevitably hit the ground or kneel. There’s little downside to wearing them (they’re light and you forget them soon after putting them on).

This one needs little explanation for anyone with external genitalia – a cup or similar groin guard for any gender can prevent a world of agony. Even though direct intentional hits to the groin are banned in any decent club, accidents happen. A thrust that goes very low or a rising cut could impact that region. For those with less exposed genitals, there are groin protectors available (though less common) that protect the pubic bone and soft tissue; while the risk is arguably less immediately painful, it’s still there and can be serious. Considering the relatively low cost and the sensitive nature of the body parts involved, this is a must-have piece of gear. Wear it every time you spar or compete. You will forget you have it on – until the day it saves you from a very painful injury, at which point you will thank yourself profusely.

Training Swords and Blade Flexibility

Not to be forgotten in the safety equation is the weapon itself. A well-designed training sword can greatly reduce the risk of injury. A common saying is “a bendy sword is a good sword” – meaning a blade that flexes well under thrust is much safer than a rigid one. Flexibility in a thrusting weapon allows it to absorb energy through deflection – flexing back on itself – when it hits a target, rather than concentrating all that force into the point. Swords that deflect under 15 kg of pressure (measured from the crossguard) are generally considered safe, but lower is generally better.

Always use swords appropriate to the activity: for full-speed sparring, use quality blades with spatulated/flared/rolled tips and or rubber blunts affixed. Overly stiff blades should be reserved for controlled drilling and sharps should only be used for test cutting, not sparring or drilling. Lighter blades should be preferred for sparring, particularly when head contact is allowed.

Inspect your swords regularly for burs (small sharp edges) and cracks. A bur can act like a serrated knife on a thrust or draw cut – file them smooth. A cracked blade is a ticking time bomb; if it breaks, the jagged piece could punch through masks or gear. At the first sign of a crack, retire the blade. It’s not worth the risk.

Practice incredible care when fencing with foam boffers and wood/nylon/plastic simulators. Due largely to risk compensation, the chance of concussion is quite high. They also do not flex like a steel simulator so thrusts can be incredibly unpleasant. Remind your newbies of this constantly.

Having covered the gamut of protective measures, remember: gear is there to mitigate injuries, but the goal is to not rely on it. Your best protection is good training, awareness, and a mutual commitment with your club mates to fence with control and respect. The following sections will discuss how communication and mindset further contribute to safety.
“Informed consent” is a term borrowed from medicine and research ethics, and it boils down to this: people should know what they’re getting into before they agree to it. In our context, every HEMA participant has the right to be informed about the risks and rules of training or sparring, so they can consent (or opt out) with full awareness. Practically speaking, this means clubs and instructors should clearly communicate the dangers and safety protocols from day one. New fencers should be taught not only how to do a technique, but also what could go wrong and how injuries usually occur. For instance, a beginner should know that “if you wear inadequate gloves, you might break a finger; concussions are possible even with a mask; thrusts can hurt your throat which is why we all wear gorgets,” and so on. Transparency about risk is key to building trust and a safety culture.

Why emphasize informed consent? Firstly, it respects the individual’s autonomy – everyone has different comfort levels with risk, and they deserve to make an educated decision about participation. Secondly, it underscores personal responsibility: when fencers are aware of the risks, they are more likely to follow safety measures and not treat them as optional. It also encourages an environment where people speak up about their limits. For example, if someone has been informed that head hits carry concussion risk, they may feel justified in saying “let’s go light to the head, please,” during sparring. Compare that to someone who was never told any risks – they might feel silly asking for that, or they might not even realize they should.

Clubs can implement informed consent in various ways. Having a waiver form is standard (listing risks like “injury, paralysis, death” – the usual legal language), but paper alone isn’t enough. A good practice is a verbal briefing or a written safety handbook given to newcomers. Instructors should periodically remind everyone, not just beginners, of these expectations. “Geared up doesn’t mean you’re invincible”, “If you feel unsafe, you can stop the fight at any time,” “Here’s how to call halt,” etc. All of this is part of informed consent and ongoing communication.

Finally, informed consent extends to day-to-day interactions: if you are nursing an injury or have a condition, inform your training partners. Let’s say you have a bad knee – if your partner knows that, they can avoid actions that would put undue stress on it. Mutual awareness of each other’s state leads to consent for specific drills or intensity. In summary, informed consent in HEMA means a transparent, honest dialogue about risks and boundaries. It builds a foundation of trust, so that when we cross swords, we do so knowing that we’ve all agreed to the same game under the same expectations. This dovetails directly into how we negotiate our sparring encounters, which we’ll cover next.

Developing a Personal Risk Profile

Every HEMA practitioner, consciously or not, has their own risk profile – essentially, an individual judgment of what level of risk is acceptable to them. This can include which injuries they’re “okay” risking and which they want to take concrete steps to avoid, how much force they are comfortable with, and what trade-offs between safety and historical realism they’re willing to make. Developing and recognizing your own risk profile is an important step in managing safety, because it helps you articulate your limits and make informed choices (thus tying back into informed consent on a personal level).

For example, consider a scenario: you read the earlier list of injuries and think, “Bruises and sore muscles? That’s fine, part of the hobby. Broken fingers? I’ll try to avoid them, but I accept it could happen to me. Concussion or serious brain injury? Absolutely not, I’m not okay with that risk.” That mental calculus right there is you sketching out a risk profile. Perhaps you conclude that you’re willing to spar at medium intensity with control, but you’ll avoid high-intensity bouts or certain weapons that are more prone to causing concussions. Or maybe you decide you’ll spar hard, but only with people who have similar experience and gear, because you deem that safer. Everyone’s profile will differ. A 25-year-old MMA fighter-turned-fencer might be fine with a higher level of risk (and have the physical conditioning to back it up), whereas a 40-year-old professional musician might be far more cautious, since a finger injury could impact their livelihood.

Importantly, there is no shame in having a more cautious risk profile. People know their priorities. In fact, one of the worst situations is when two fencers with mismatched risk profiles train together without realizing it. Imagine one fencer came up in a club where injuries were seen as badges of honor – they’re used to continuous full-contact sparring and think nothing of a hard hit (their accepted risk is high). The other fencer comes from a club that emphasized technical play and light touch sparring – they value control and have rarely been truly walloped. If these two fence without discussion, the first might come in swinging for the fences, and the second will possibly be injured or at least very upset.

The solution is twofold: know your own profile and seek to understand your training partner’s profile. Then find common ground. This may involve compromise – maybe the harder hitter agrees to dial back to say 70% speed/power, and the more cautious fencer agrees to try that level. Or they don’t find a good overlap, and they choose not to spar – which is completely okay! More on that in a moment. The take-home point here is: take some time to explicitly consider what risks you accept. What injuries are you willing to risk? What level of contact do you want? This can change over time, too – after an injury, many people adjust their profile (e.g., “I’m never doing unscripted dagger sparring without a neck guard again after that throat scare” or “I’m done with steel longsword free sparring; I’ll stick to smallsword because I got a concussion last year”). That kind of reflection is healthy. Discuss your stance with instructors or peers – you might be surprised to find many share your concerns. Knowing yourself and communicating your limits is one of the best safety tools you have.

Communicating and Negotiating Sparring Terms

Before any bout or drill with a partner, especially one of higher intensity, there should be a brief negotiation or agreement on how you’re going to fence. In practice this might be as simple as “Hey, want to go about 75% speed/power, no thrusts to the face?” – “Sure, sounds good.” It might feel formal to call it a “negotiation,” but that’s essentially what it is: two people aligning on the rules of engagement. This step is crucial for ensuring informed consent carries into each specific interaction. Both fencers get to voice their goals or any limitations (e.g., “Can we avoid leg cuts? My knee’s a bit tender”, “I’d like to practice counters, so let’s go slower”, or “Can I see your sword? I just want to get a feel for how flexible it is before I’d be okay with a thrust”). Once you have an agreement, you’ve established a zone of trust for that sparring session.

One-Sided Negotiations

Sometimes you’ll find yourself about to spar with someone who doesn’t initiate any conversation about intensity or rules. Perhaps they’re much less experienced and don’t even know how to articulate their preferences, or they come from a culture of just “swordfight and see what happens”. If you’re the more experienced or more risk-aware person in the pair, this puts you in the driver’s seat to ensure safety. You have two main options:

Educate and Set Terms

Take the lead and gently ask questions or set boundaries. For example: “Hey, are you cool with medium contact? Nothing too hard to the head?” or “Any injuries or things you want to avoid?” This can prompt the less experienced fencer to think about their own limits. You might essentially help them form their first risk profile by discussing these points. This is a teachable moment – you’re not only making this particular exchange safer, you’re also modeling good practice for them to use in the future. As an experienced fencer, this is a chance to positively influence the culture by showing that negotiation is a normal part of sparring.

Opt-Out (Walk Away)

If, for whatever reason, you can’t establish clear communication – maybe the person isn’t that responsive, or you have a gut feeling that they are not going to respect the agreed rules – it is perfectly acceptable to not spar with them. For instance, if a newbie is very nervous and just says “I dunno, I just want to spar,” and you sense they might flail unpredictably, you might decide it’s safer to pair them with an instructor or someone who can manage that. Or if someone has a reputation for going too hard and dismisses your attempt to set limits (“C’mon, we’re both in full kit!”), you are well within your rights to decline. Fencing with someone who cannot or will not articulate and respect boundaries is a recipe for injury and violates the principle of informed consent.

Failed Negotiations (No Agreement)

Not every potential sparring pair will find mutually agreeable terms – and that’s okay. Perhaps you wanted a light technical spar, and the other person really wants an intense competitive bout. If neither is willing to bend, the best outcome is not to fence each other at that time. This isn’t a failure; in fact, it’s a success of good judgment. Both of you can then seek out others who match your desired intensity. Ending the negotiation with “Maybe next time, with different gear or after I recover,” or simply bowing out, is a mature and safe decision. Remember, there will always be plenty of other opportunities.

The critical point is to voice these things before you start, not after someone is nearly injured (or worse.) By communicating up front, you ensure both parties are truly consenting to the type of bout you’re about to have. This practice builds mutual respect and greatly reduces the kinds of misunderstandings that lead to injury.

Alternative: Club-Level Calibration

SoCal Swords in California uses a mutually agreed-upon and—crucially—physically posted calibration rubric that categorizes fencing by intensity, gear and supervision requirements, control, and expected outcomes. It’s a strong model for other clubs to emulate.

Handling Incidents: Aftermath and Improvement

No matter how careful we are, accidents can still occur. How we handle them post-incident is important for both the individuals involved and the broader community. Here’s a breakdown of what to do after an incident and how to use it as a learning opportunity:

Immediate Aftermath

If an injury happens, stop the activity immediately. Safety of the injured person is the priority. Use the agreed safety call (often “Halt!” or “Stop!”) – in many clubs, anyone can call halt if they see an injury or dangerous situation. Once halted, ensure the scene is safe (e.g., don’t leave swords lying around people who might trip while rushing to help). Apply first aid within your competence: have a first aid kit accessible at your club or event. For minor injuries like small cuts or bruises, basic first aid and a short rest might suffice. For more serious injuries (suspected fracture, head injury, deep cut), seek professional medical help promptly. For a head blow, ensure that the Concussion Recognition Tool 5 (CRT5) handout is being followed, early detection is crucial. When in doubt, err on the side of caution and call emergency services, especially for anything involving head trauma, loss of consciousness, spine, or severe bleeding.

Document the Incident

Once the injured person is stable and being cared for, it’s useful to document what happened. This isn’t about blaming – it’s about gathering facts while they’re fresh. Note the time, the activity being done, the people involved, the gear in use, and exactly what led to the injury (e.g., “During free sparring with longswords, fencer A attempted a zwerchhau; fencer B stepped in and was struck on the side of the head above the ear. Fencer B was wearing a 350N mask with a thick overlay but reported immediate dizziness.”). If the injured person is able, get their input on how they feel and what they think happened. If there were witnesses (instructors or other students), have them write a brief statement. This information can be invaluable for later analysis to prevent reoccurrence. Many clubs have an incident report form or at least an informal log – it’s good practice to maintain one. It might be as simple as an entry in a notebook or an online spreadsheet. The HEMAA safety policy suggests having a procedure for reporting safety concerns and incidents. By reporting and recording, patterns can be recognized (e.g., “hmm, we’ve had three falls all on that same patch of uneven flooring”).

Communicate and Reflect

After the incident, gather those involved (once everyone is okay) and talk it through. This isn’t a finger-pointing exercise; it’s a constructive debrief. Ask questions: What did we learn? Did a safety rule fail or was it just bad luck? Was gear at fault (e.g., did a mask buckle break)? Could this have been avoided with different behavior or equipment? Often this conversation yields insights. For example, maybe you realize that the bout had been escalating in intensity and a coach should have intervened earlier. Or that the injured fencer had been feeling fatigued which led to a lapse in defense – highlighting the importance of not pushing past exhaustion. These reflections can lead to concrete action.

Reporting to Wider Community (if applicable)

If the incident is serious (say a broken bone, concussion, or worse), consider reporting it to the wider HEMA community channels. This could be via a Facebook group, forum, or your national HEMA federation if one exists. The reason is to alert others of any equipment failures or safety issues. For instance, in the past when a particular brand of mask had a known weakness, community reports helped spread awareness so people could retrofit or stop using them. If a certain technique or drill consistently causes injuries, sharing that info lets other clubs modify their approach. This collective learning is how HEMA’s safety standards improve over time. Of course, respect privacy – don’t publicly name people without consent, and frame it as learning, not shaming.

Adjusting Safety Protocols / Code of Conduct

An incident often reveals gaps in your safety measures. Use it as fuel to improve your club’s Code of Conduct or safety policies. If your CoC didn’t explicitly forbid some dangerous behavior that led to an injury, maybe it should be updated to do so. If an equipment failure happened, perhaps you need to add a rule about more frequent gear inspections or mandating higher-spec gear. For example, if someone was hurt because they weren’t wearing a gorget, you might update the rules: “All fencers must wear throat protection when sparring.” Or if an experienced fencer injured a beginner by going too hard, you might tighten your guidelines on level mismatches – maybe requiring senior fencers to always calibrate to the junior person’s level, and adding that to your CoC as an expectation. These changes should be communicated to all members clearly (in a meeting or written announcement). Emphasize that it’s a learning-driven change: “We had an incident, here’s what we learned, and here’s what we’re implementing so it doesn’t happen again.” This way, the whole club evolves its safety culture from each incident.

Further Follow Up

In essence, handling incidents together is about support and improvement. Support the injured party (ensure they recover and feel they can come back without stigma or fear, when ready) and improve your practices to reduce future risk. After an incident, some people might feel shaken or guilty – address those feelings. Reinforce that the goal is to come back safer. If necessary, take a short safety stand-down: for instance, “No free sparring for the rest of today, let’s work on controlled drills while we decompress.” This can help everyone mentally reset.

Finally, don’t forget to follow up on the injured person’s condition in days to come. A community that cares for its members post-injury will retain trust and openness in discussing safety. If the injury was serious, ensure any return-to-training is gradual and in line with medical advice (especially for concussions – insist on proper rest and clearance). Incorporate what happened into your beginner teachings as well – not to scare newcomers, but to honestly convey why you have the rules you do. For example, “We require 1600N masks now because last year we had a mask punch-through incident with a 350N mask; someone got a bad cut. We learned our lesson.” This kind of institutional memory keeps improvements in place long-term.

Sources and References

Accident Analysis & Prevention. (2007). Drivers overtaking bicyclists: Does wearing a helmet influence passing distance? 39(2), 423–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.010

Concussion in Sport Group. (2017). Concussion recognition tool 5 (CRT-5). British Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(11), 872. https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/51/11/872.full.pdf

Di Virgilio, T. G., Hunter, A., Wilson, L., Stewart, W., Morris, P., Bailey, A., & Newell, M. (2016). Evidence for acute electrophysiological and cognitive changes following routine soccer heading. EBioMedicine, 13, 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.10.029

European Committee for Standardization. (2007). EN 13567:2002 +A1:2007 – Protective clothing for fencers: Requirements and test methods. https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/8a852713-c8df-4a46-833c-67c1e3da9bc9/en-13567-2002a1-2007

Faits d’Armes. (2022, August 15). 350 N vs 1600 N fencing masks—What’s the difference? https://faitsdarmes.com/en/content/20-350n-vs-1600n-fencing-mask-what-s-the-difference

Farrell, K. (2017, March 30). What is the difference between a “350 N” fencing mask and a “1600 N” fencing mask? KeithFarrell.net. https://www.keithfarrell.net/blog/2017/09/difference-350n-fencing-mask-1600n-fencing-mask

Farrell, K. (2017, March 30). Safe training swords, part 2: Measuring flexibility. KeithFarrell.net. https://www.keithfarrell.net/blog/safe-training-swords-measuring-flexibility

Fédération Internationale d’Escrime. (2024). Material rules for fencing. https://static.fie.org/uploads/34/172612-book%20m%20ang.pdf

Franklin, S. (2019, January 9). Accelerating the wrist in a cut — It doesn’t work! SWORDSTEM. https://swordstem.com/2019/01/09/accelerating-the-wrist-in-a-cut-it-doesnt-work

Franklin, S. (2021, January 20). “Safe sword” is made-up words. SWORDSTEM. https://swordstem.com/2021/01/20/safe-sword-is-made-up-words

Franklin, S. (2022, March 7). Punches hit harder than cuts? SWORDSTEM. https://swordstem.com/2022/03/07/punches-hit-harder-than-cuts

Franklin, S. (2022, October 17). Everything you ever wanted to know about blade flex. SWORDSTEM. https://swordstem.com/2022/10/17/sword-flex


Franklin, S. (2023, April 1). Drop testing for evaluation of potential HEMA protective material. SWORDSTEM. https://swordstem.com/2023/04/01/drop-testing-for-evaluation-of-potential-hema-protective-material

Hedlund, J. (2000). Risky business: Safety regulations, risk compensation, and individual behavior. Injury Prevention, 6(2), 82–89. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.6.2.82

HEMA Alliance. (n.d.). Training safely. Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://www.hemaalliance.com/training-safely

Hollis, S. J., Hume, P. A., & Marshall, S. W. (2021). Headgear use and concussion incidence in youth rugby: A prospective cohort study. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 24(3), 232–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2020.09.012

Morrongiello, B. A., Walpole, B., & Lasenby, J. (2007). Children take greater risks when wearing safety gear: The role of protection perception. Health Psychology, 26(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.198

Rowson, S., Duma, S. M., Greenwald, R. M., Chu, J. J., & Crisco, J. J. (2014). Can helmet design reduce the risk of concussion in football? Technical note. Journal of Neurosurgery, 120(4), 919–922. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.1.JNS13916

Skulltec. (n.d.). Impact test results for Skulltec protective liner. Retrieved June 12, 2025, from https://skulltec.com/pages/impact-testing

Walker, I. (2007). Drivers overtaking bicyclists: Does wearing a helmet influence passing distance? Accident Analysis & Prevention, 39(2), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.010

Wauters, S., & Van Tiggelen, D. (2016). Injury profile of longsword fencing in Historical European martial arts: A retrospective questionnaire study. Journal of Combat Sports and Martial Arts, 7(2), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.5604/20815735.1227843

Weinstein, N. D. (1980). Unrealistic optimism about future life events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 806–820. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.806